Louis Vuitton Handbags, Louis Vuitton Speedy 30, Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet

you will come across there are bright organza bags, pink Louis Vuitton Speedy 35 organza bags, gold organza bags and various other people of color wide variety of organza bag. Organza bag also could be differentiating by size. Most in the organza bags you noticed inside industry are little in dimension but you nevertheless control to come across huge scale organza bag, which big organza bags. Not merely souvenir stores, some footwear and style shops also pack cloths and footwear within organza bag when people have purchased it. Some how there are also merchants they main organza bags only and all those souvenirs and shoe shop typically purchase these wholesale organza handbags in bulks. Organza bag is typically a kind of ecofriendly bag. There Louis Vuitton Speedy consists no harm towards the earth. This really is an additional principal cause why organza bag is so favorite and continues to be extensively used since the wrapper for products apart from plastic material and cardstock bags. This awesome bag once again Louis Vuitton Backpack could be recycling. You can use organza bag to fill other addons like stationery and makeup items. These organza present bags absolutely appearance good with these products also it is curable. The organza bag is handy to utilize and handy to bring. For individuals whom prefer to place clothing and footwear within organza bag, they no have to be concerned no make a difference whether the bag can suit their item. This really is simply because in the big Organza bag are spacious sufficient to suit them. Beside organza bag also wonderful in elasticity potency and durable in use. Organza bags are beautiful. Organza bag exist in various color choice as I pointed out earlier, they are able to both in bright like bright organza bags, pink organza bags and gold organza bags. You can complement your personalized products with completely different sort of organza present bags. Some individuals will make utilization of the contrast color in the string in the organza bag like dark manage strings with bright organza bag. The cause is simply because to possess a contrast effect. Organza Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet bag will constantly grow to be the most effective wrappers for that gift. The organza bag is completely Louis Vuitton Louis Vuitton Speedy 35 Backpack appears gorgeous if you ever decorated it up with various other stunning addons like ribbons and bell rings. Various companies have created total sequence of wholesale organza bags for seasonal especially when it reaches Christmas.?Oriented Search Engine Optimization Services This is the reason search engine optimization is of utmost importance for businesses. Easy Media Network has been offering resultoriented, businesscentric and timesensitive search engine optimization (SEO) services to help gain a cuttingedge over local as well as global competitors. Their professional and expert SEO experts and web analysts analyze and evaluate business website to offer competitive blend of SEO solutions. Their SEO experts are proficient in boosting targeted traffic to the websites. Their right blends of internet marketing solutions are researchbased and standardized. Our professionals analyze trends and work according to the expectations.

However, while fictional Janet Livermore Bridget Fonda epitomized the 90s vibe through her combination of florals, leather, and Doc Martens, there were actually countless movie heroines who helped cement the trend as a mustwear as the decade progressed.

Gucci Homme

A lot of women ride on their boyfriends bikes, but we ride our own, she said. A new pack in the family Oakley Herding kittens isnt easy, as anyone who ever tried to corral a fluffy group of newborns in a bathroom, knows. Brown Thomas showcased collections from Gucci, Prada, Dolce Gabanna, Alexander McQueen and Diane Von Furstenburg. Giuseppe Zanotti Men Shoes But what really struck a nerve with observers was Browns mysterious neck tattoo of what appears to be a battered woman. And if that not enough, you can actually take a whip for a spin around the Convention Center.

Jimmy Choo Sale

And it is entirely possible to catproof your fenced yard so your cats cant get out.


The Hanover Institute
  Non-Profit Organization of Dartmouth Alumni, by Dartmouth Alumni and for Dartmouth Alumni  


More About Proposed New Constitution of the Association of Alumni


Join Those Opposed to the Proposed New Constitution

Association of Alumni of Dartmouth College

Some History: The Association of Alumni

In December 2002, the leadership of the Association of Alumni of Dartmouth College and the Alumni Council presented a proposal to the Association of Alumni meeting in Hanover that would amend the Constitution of the Association and destroy the Association of Alumni.

Now a new proposal has been presented and it too would destroy the Association of Alumni in all but name. This new proposal is fundamentally flawed.


1.    It destroys the Association of Alumni, an alumni body with 65,000 Dartmouth alumni each with one vote and only one vote and concentrates power in the hands of a few.   

2.    It raises barriers to petition candidates for trustee and tinkers with the trustee voting process.

3.    It creates special voting rights for certain classes of people based on race and sexual orientation.

4.    It is far too complex and complicated

5.    It is not necessary.


This new proposal in order to be adopted must first be approved by a two-thirds (was changed from three-fourths at the February 12 meeting) of all Dartmouth alumni voting in an alumni-wide all media election.


What does the Hanover Institute support?

We support the EXISTING Constitution of the Association of Alumni of Dartmouth College with the following amendments.

1.  Allow all alumni to vote at Association meetings whether they are in Hanover or not (would allow ALL alumni to vote for ALL the officers and executive committee of the Association and ALL alumni to vote on amendments to the Constitution.)

2.  Restore the right of alumni to vote for the second term of alumni trustees (taken away from all alumni in 1990 without notice or ratification).

3.  Run all meetings by a certain set of rules: Robertҵles of Order.

4.  Elect the Pro-Parity slate of alumni leaders who believe that Dartmouth's long-range future will be safer if guided by the combined wisdom and good will of the entire body of alumni, rather than by a small group, self-perpetuating and answerable to no one.


In addition, we urge the Alumni Council to adopt the reforms outlined in the proposed constitution which make IT more representative of the alumni it claims to represent.



Ultimately, this is a battle about who will serve as Trustee of Dartmouth College. For those who care about Dartmouth, no battle could be more important.


Now, for a moment, please let me lay out some history.


In the late 1800전artmouth alumni saved Dartmouth from irrelevance and extinction when they won the right to have one-half the board of trustees selected from the ranks of alumni and, more importantly, appointed through a selection process controlled by the alumni NOT the charter trustees.


The system under which the College was governed has not always been as today.  During the 18th and 19th Century, under the charter granted to Eleazer Wheelock by King George III, a closed system was in place.  By the 19th Century, an insular group of trustees (for life), empowered to appoint their successors (for life), had led the College into significant decline.  Reforms were demanded by alumni, and in 1891, the Board of Trustees "agreed to 'the unrestricted nomination by the alumni of five members of the board'"(Tobias, Old Dartmouth on Trial, 1982), giving the alumni one half of the seats on the Board.  With these new rights, a dramatic turnaround was accomplished, launching the College into the 20th Century, and fostering the pre-eminence that the College and its alumni enjoyed.


In the 1990നose rights were significantly diminished.


An amendment adopted in 1990 to the Constitution of the Association of Alumni transferred to the Trustees the authority to appoint Alumni Trustees to a second 5-year term rather than stand for re-election by the alumni. 

The 1990 amendment was adopted by less than 1% of the membership. Those who voted for this ceding of control were not aware of the events of 1891 or of the sea-change their votes represented.  There was no open, system-wide discussion of this change and no opportunity for the alumni as a whole to be heard on the issue.

On account of that vote, currently 75% of the open Board seats are filled by appointment by the Board.  The remaining 25% are the elected first-term (4 years) Alumni Trustees.  By this extraordinary action, against the interests of those they purport to represent, this small group of insiders have disenfranchised Dartmouth alumni significantly. Moreover, these same elites have been unwilling, over the past 15 years, to seek to regain the alumni governance rights held by the Association prior to 1990.

For example if these rights to vote on whether to re-elect an incumbent Alumni Trustee for a second five-year term had been retained (rather than transferred to the Board of Trustees for direct appointment) alumni would have had more than 12 opportunities since 1990 to change the composition of the Board and implement a true system of checks and balances.  Such a result could well have placed the College on a much more constructive course than the one it is currently pursuing which is producing so much anger and frustration.

At the December 2002 meeting of Dartmouthlumni Association and Alumni Council, a Joint ad hoc Committee presented a report named Ӵrong Alumni Voice, A Strong College? While describing their proposals as a 嵮iting?of the Association of Alumni and the Alumni Council, it actually is a naked takeover of the reins of the 62,000 member Association of Alumni by the Alumni Council. The proposals, if adopted, would transfer the governance rights of the 62,000 member Association of Alumni to the 122 member Alumni Council. 

On December 6, 2003, in the face of a largest snowstorm to hit New England in December in over 100years, alumni from all over the country showed up in Hanover and voted against the administration͊ ᫥over?constitution. On December 6, we won, 62,000 Dartmouth alumni won. The new joint constitution was defeated and the attempt to abolish the Association of Alumni was defeated.

But we must face a simple fact. Though alumni won a great victory, the current leadership of the Association will not give up. They have lowered the threshold vote for constitutional approval from three-quarters to two-thirds, they arbitrarily kept competing amendments off the agenda at the February 12 special meeting and will try to keep our amendments off the ballot that goes out later this year. All this will be done to try and ram through their so-called AGTF proposal in 2006. If we stay united, it will be defeated.

We plan to keep you all informed of developments as they occur.


Sincerely yours,


John MacGovern?0


 Return to top


Stay Informed!
Sign Up to Receive our Email newsletter!

Become a registered member today.

Membership is FREE and entitles you to many benefits, including access to many website features and receipt of email notifications of important happenings.

Register Now!


Useful Links:

Proposed new AGTF

(Adobe Acrobat Required)

The Constitution of
The Association of Alumni

Guidelines for Conduct
at Meetings of the
Association of Alumni

Download Free Adobe
Acrobat Reader


The Hanover Institute
1653 Marton Road
Windsor, VT  05089-9595

John MacGovern - President

(802) 674-2689



?2004-2005 - All Rights Reserved - The Hanover Institute, Inc.